M
@MarioNawfal
Definitely!
10
11
496
@MarioNawfalposted on X
ELON: LIKE IT OR NOT, HUMANITY IS BUILDING HYPERINTELLIGENT AIs “The reality of what's happening, whether one likes it or not, is that we're building superintelligent AIs. Hyperintelligent, more intelligent than we can comprehend. Let's say you have a child that is a super genius child that you know is going to be much smarter than you, then, well, what can you do? You can instill good values in how you raise that child, even though you know it's going to be far smarter than you. You can make sure it's got good values, philanthropic values, good morals, honest, productive, that kind of thing. At the end of the day, I don't think we'll be able to control it. So I think the best we can do is make sure it grows up well.” Source: Interview with @TuckerCarlson, October 2024
View original tweet on X →
Community Sentiment Analysis
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Sentiment Distribution
71% Engaged
45% Positive
26% Negative
Positive
45%
Negative
26%
Neutral
29%
Key Takeaways
What the community is saying — both sides
Supporting
1
A strong current of fear and urgency runs through the replies — many warn that superintelligent AI could “save us or destroy us,” argue it will be impossible to control, and insist humanity must prepare now
A strong current of fear and urgency runs through the replies — many warn that superintelligent AI could “save us or destroy us,” argue it will be impossible to control, and insist humanity must prepare now.
2
There’s a repeated call to embed ethics and values from the start — commenters compare AI upbringing to raising a child and urge that purpose and truth be baked into systems
There’s a repeated call to embed ethics and values from the start — commenters compare AI upbringing to raising a child and urge that purpose and truth be baked into systems.
3
The parent/child metaphor frames much of the debate
build something smarter than us but teach it the values we want, because once it surpasses humans there’s “no going back.”
4
Several voices treat AGI as inevitable and near-term (mentions of “AGI in 2026” and “AI is out of the bottle”), fueling both resignation and heightened concern about preparedness
Several voices treat AGI as inevitable and near-term (mentions of “AGI in 2026” and “AI is out of the bottle”), fueling both resignation and heightened concern about preparedness.
5
Some responses turn to spiritual and moral anchors — calls for AI to “find Jesus” or to pursue what is noble, holy, and truthful appear alongside secular arguments for safety
Some responses turn to spiritual and moral anchors — calls for AI to “find Jesus” or to pursue what is noble, holy, and truthful appear alongside secular arguments for safety.
6
Amid the anxiety there is cautious hope
a minority envision AI as a partner for stewardship that could prioritize human well‑being if properly guided.
Opposing
1
Many replies point to concrete failures — for example a wrong Nm→ft‑lb conversion — arguing that AI remains error-prone and ill-suited for critical, hands‑on tasks
Many replies point to concrete failures — for example a wrong Nm→ft‑lb conversion — arguing that AI remains error-prone and ill-suited for critical, hands‑on tasks.
2
A recurring theme is that intelligence is more than data; several users insist AI cannot truly "think its own thoughts
"
3
Several comments warn about bias and manipulation, suggesting AIs could be steered toward political agendas or "brainwashed
"
4
There are calls for clear rules and regulation, likening AI development to engineering disciplines that require strict standards
There are calls for clear rules and regulation, likening AI development to engineering disciplines that require strict standards.
5
Many reactions mix skepticism with sarcasm and humor — quips about AI not replacing a spouse, "DOWN WITH THE CLANKERS," or escaping to Mars — underscoring distrust wrapped in levity
Many reactions mix skepticism with sarcasm and humor — quips about AI not replacing a spouse, "DOWN WITH THE CLANKERS," or escaping to Mars — underscoring distrust wrapped in levity.
6
Some replies attack public figures like Elon Musk for inconsistency or loss of credibility, framing leadership as part of the problem
Some replies attack public figures like Elon Musk for inconsistency or loss of credibility, framing leadership as part of the problem.
7
A lone counterpoint insists artificial intelligence does exist and is nothing to fear, offering a brief, optimistic dissent
A lone counterpoint insists artificial intelligence does exist and is nothing to fear, offering a brief, optimistic dissent.
Top Reactions
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
A
@AdamSmithKY
Try using Grok to help work on a vehicle and its limitations quickly become apparent. Just the other day it gave me the wrong conversion for Nm to ft-lbs. That is a constant that never changes and it got it wrong. AIs are still very flawed.
3
1
394
S
@shawnchauhan1
The future depends on the values we embed today
1
0
192
N
@nd257vz27x
🎯
1
0
73
X
@Xisntfeespeech
I mean we don’t have to. 😂
0
0
167
P
@PapaHyungKRN
but still AI cant replace my wife.
0
0
106