@demontraderr
Google Trends ≠ product quality — it’s hype cycles vs habit. Curious how much of this is novelty from X exposure versus real daily retention 👀
Twitter sentiment: 69.30% support for Grok as ChatGPT search interest drops. Data shows a strong user shift to Grok with little confrontation across Twitter.
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Community concerns and opposing viewpoints
Many argue Google Trends ≠ product quality; they frame trends as hype cycles while true success comes from daily retention and habitual use.
Several emphasize that search interest measures curiosity, not usage — people don’t Google tools they already use every day.
replies describe outputs as childish, repetitive, and lacking depth, warning it could “go straight off a cliff” if not fixed.
A defensive thread elevates ChatGPT as the benchmark, with comments like “chatgpt still the father” and claims Grok won’t catch up unless ChatGPT falters.
without strong PR, Grok struggles against ChatGPT, and some see current interest as novelty from X exposure rather than lasting retention.
One reply in Japanese frames the debate as 誠実でない vs 細部は後回し — hinting at concerns over perceived sincerity versus postponing polish and details.
Google Trends ≠ product quality — it’s hype cycles vs habit. Curious how much of this is novelty from X exposure versus real daily retention 👀
chatgpt still the father of all
Are you sure about that? These past few days Grok has been lobotomized hard – responses have the IQ of a 3-year-old, shallow, repetitive, and completely gutted of depth. If you don’t fix this soon, it’s going straight off a cliff and downhill fast.
Community members who agree with this perspective
many replies cheer Grok as the new winner, with users touting cancelled ChatGPT subscriptions and proclamations like “Grok is the future” or “Grok is king,” reflecting enthusiastic user adoption and fanfare.
people repeatedly praise better coding, image/video generation, and practical features (some even mention uploading bloodwork), arguing Grok outperforms ChatGPT on usefulness and output quality.
several posts slam ChatGPT’s “I cannot fulfill this request” templates and what they call excessive censorship, celebrating Grok’s more candid, human-feeling responses and up-to-the-minute data access.
commenters point to Grok’s integration with X, access to live data, and viral attention as concrete drivers — in-app integration and platform data are framed as giving Grok a real usage advantage.
replies highlight concrete wins in coding help, image/video creation, and health diagnostics as reasons people prefer Grok, not just branding or hype.
a steady stream of playful tags, memes and rallying cries (“Grok gang,” celebratory GIFs) shows the brand is gaining cultural traction beyond technical praise.
amid the hype there are measured takes — people saying they’re “excited to see how it grows” or urging competitors to improve, reflecting watchful optimism rather than blind endorsement.
some replies speculate rapid scaling (trillions of parameters, political influence) and widening gaps with rivals, suggesting both confident expectation of dominance and implicit concerns about unchecked growth and competitive fallout.
chatgpt is now a past thing, future is Grok
Grok is the future
And this trend will continue, the gap will widen. People want facts in real-time, not narratives...