@FaultyButton
I have not enjoyed Grok for coding
Analysis: Tweet about Grok's #1 ranking shows 69% supportive sentiment and 10% confronting. Highlights leadership in programming and Open Router standings.
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Community concerns and opposing viewpoints
Many replies dismiss Grok’s performance — short takes like “BS,” “don’t enjoy Grok for coding,” and complaints about poor results recur throughout.
Multiple users say Grok is used because it’s free, not because it’s better (“Because it is free. No other reason.”).
Repeated comparisons favor Gemini and Codex — users claim Gemini gives better answers and Codex holds context more reliably.
Several tweets question Grok’s ability to keep context, agree internally, or produce consistent outputs (“grok doesn’t even agree,” “grok dont play fair”).
A strain of irritation at over-promotion appears — calls to “stop over hyping” and dismissive reactions like “No one cares” and clown emojis.
A few cite a tournament where Grok won, yet others immediately question the data’s authenticity and relevance.
The thread includes jokes, astrology/exoplanet quips, anime asks, and a German note about image generation limits — mixing critiques with playful replies.
I have not enjoyed Grok for coding
grok dont play fair, smh
access ≠ efficacy
Community members who agree with this perspective
Replies are full of cheers, emojis and congratulations — many users call Grok “#1,” “dominating,” and “absolute domination,” celebrating a perceived upset of established models.
Builders emphasize that the programming leaderboard is what matters, with comments like “time to update our API keys” and praise for Grok’s precision in coding tasks.
Numerous replies point to fast iteration and real-world usage as the driver — users say adoption is accelerating and that sustained performance, not marketing, is shifting the hierarchy.
Many frame this as a win for open models and competitive innovation, framing Grok’s rise as a challenge to Google/OpenAI and a market-driven verdict.
Several voices note the trade-offs — some credit raw performance to fewer safety filters, while others acknowledge Grok still makes mistakes and needs refinement.
Respondents highlight real use cases — music videos, research, productivity gains, even rocket-trajectory ideas — portraying Grok as useful beyond demos.
A number of replies project bullish futures (Grok 5/6, new benchmarks like .faf) and urge standards or new metrics to cement the momentum.
Winning.
Love 🤍 @grok
Yes ofcourse Don’t google it Grok it