Tweets on Paul Conyngham's dog vaccine: 57.6% supportive, 7.0% confronting. Headlines favor ChatGPT, but Grok reportedly designed the final mRNA vaccine.
Too many headlines are only talking about how a man used ChatGPT to design a cancer vaccine for his dog But the truth is Paul Conyngham himself stated that the final mRNA vaccine construct for his dog Rosie was actually designed by Grok This fact is buried deep underground The exact sequence that shrank her terminal tumor by 75%: - Sequenced the DNA: He paid $3,000 to sequence both her healthy genome and the tumor's DNA to find the damage - Analyzed the Mutations: Used AI tools like AlphaFold to compare the data and identify the cancer-specific mutated proteins - Designed with Grok: He leveraged Grok to design the final custom mRNA vaccine blueprint to target those exact mutations - Manufactured & Injected: He partnered with university researchers to manufacture the custom nanoparticle vaccine and successfully administered the doses Every headline is pushing ChatGPT....but the final design that actually shrank the cancer by 75% was done by Grok
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
What the community is saying — both sides
Many replies insist the decisive vaccine blueprint that shrank Rosie’s tumor came from Grok, not ChatGPT — and that the media picked the catchiest brand, not the actual contributor.
Threads repeatedly point to sequencing, AlphaFold protein analysis, Grok’s design step, university manufacturing and vets — an ecosystem of tools and people made it work.
” Several voices demand audit trails or standardized reporting so researchers, regulators and the public can know which model did what.
A large group simply praises Grok (and Elon) as the real hero, treating this as proof of superior reasoning and a marketing win for xAI.
Many replies note journalists use “ChatGPT” as shorthand for all LLMs, flattening complex workflows into a single, misleading headline.
Some warn that community-driven personalized vaccines and university partnerships expose gaps in oversight, while others cheer “democratized” access — both sides ask who bears responsibility.
show the data and outputs. Numerous replies ask Grok/Paul to publish the exact inputs, AI outputs and protocols so results can be scrutinized and replicated.
Several comments emphasize the owner’s months of work, ethics filings and lab partnerships — AI empowered a “relentless generalist,” it didn’t act alone.
one anecdote isn’t clinical proof. Many remind readers this was an experimental, one-off case with reported ~75% shrinkage and that clinical validation, peer review and trials are still required.
Mainstream/left-leaning outlets want bad headlines about Elon’s companies — critics argue media bias and political animus against Trump/Republicans drive relentless negative coverage of xAI and grok.
Don’t bet on a single model — combine them — several replies urge building systems that leverage Grok, Claude, Gemini and GPT together, using each model’s strengths instead of choosing one.
DeepMind/AlphaFold — some replies emphasize that tangible scientific wins (like AlphaFold’s protein work) come from other labs, not just chat models.
mRNA mistrust mixed with grudging praise — a thread of conspiracy-minded replies calls the mRNA rollout a “psyop,” while also noting the platform’s speed in enabling new treatments.
Prioritize meaningful AI uses and ethical trade-offs — a view pushes AI toward practical, humane ends (even arguing “euthanasia is empathy” for suffering animals) and warns against wasting resources on trivial tasks.
g. , “furnishing” vs. GPT “building”), arguing model strengths are domain-specific.
Grok’s popularity and viability are questioned — counter replies say “no one uses Grok,” argue its case is invalid, and warn that without funding Grok would not survive.
Fear of AI misuse, including weapons — a strand raises alarm that models like GPT can be repurposed for weapon design or other harmful government uses.
Strong enthusiasm for GPT — alongside criticism, some replies are unabashedly pro-GPT, calling it “an amazing tool” and defending its utility.
Most popular replies, ranked by engagement
gned the final mRNA vaccine construct that shrank a dog’s terminal tumor by 75 percent. The owner confirmed Grok produced the decisive blueprint after DNA sequencing and mutation analysis. Headlines credited ChatGPT instead. This showcases xAI’s unique advantage. Superior
Grok is just getting started. Once xAI is done restructuring, things are going to get very interesting, very quickly.
Grok Rocks the others
ing that is holding xAI and grok and honestly every elon musk business back is that they only really get negative press, because they hate Trump and republicans so much, there can never be anything positive said. Remember when TMZ cheered that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck
Now the world will know why they did the MRNA psyop on the world! It was the only way to push the MRNA platform on the pu pic quickly. Evil Yes Horrible Yes Sick twisted overlords Yes! But now the options of treatments is endless! Look how fast they can make cures!
My version of AI says: euthanasia is empathy. Use AI for purposes that matter. Your dog can't communicate about his pain, so just permit him to die decently and if you really love animals: then try to build your own b12 vitamins instead of wasting AI resources. Sorry bro.