@Civilliqn
I wonder if Elon actually knows what he's talking about. I wonder if KRSONE actually knew what he was talking about whenever I decided to listen.
Tweet analysis: Musk suggests convergence of SpaceX, Tesla and xAI toward solar-powered AI satellites. Sentiment: 70% support, 8.67% confront — public interest rising.
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Community concerns and opposing viewpoints
Many replies mock the technical claims — calling the gap between “solar powered satellites” and reality where “physics goes to die” — and treat the vision as utopian without proof of concept.
Several users accuse him of lying, being a puppet, or lacking empathy, with blunt personal attacks like “you lie so much” and “you suck.”
Comments such as “cool so earth dies but ai gets solar panels” and “bro in 2050” use sarcasm to express cynicism about priorities and timelines.
A few replies push a pragmatic alternative — “Just work with Google” and notes that Google is already moving into related areas.
Some responses focus on immediate product needs, e.g., “Tell him to fix visual assistant,” preferring incremental improvements over grand promises.
Most replies have very few likes and include terse or cryptic posts (“Epsten clan !!”, “I fb.”), signaling a mix of derision, niche references, and limited amplification.
I wonder if Elon actually knows what he's talking about. I wonder if KRSONE actually knew what he was talking about whenever I decided to listen.
Google is already moving into this.. Just work with Google.
I fb
Community members who agree with this perspective
A chorus of admiration greets the idea — readers call it visionary, “mind‑blowing,” and “genius,” celebrating the audacity of linking Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI into a single technological narrative.
energy is the bottleneck. Many argue that moving compute nearer to the Sun is the logical response to soaring power demands.
this is vertical integration writ large — Tesla for energy, SpaceX for launch/orbit, and xAI for the brains — presented as a single, end‑to‑end stack.
tweets invoke Kardashev‑scale thinking, Mars infrastructure, and unlimited orbital compute as the path beyond terrestrial limits.
users ask how energy would be transferred from satellites to Earth and request simple explanations (EIL5), signaling real demand for technical clarity.
Several voices highlight governance and strategic implications — praise for privately bypassing Washington’s procurement inertia and speculation about defense/contracting advantages and market dominance.
reduced pollution, lower water use, and more resilient energy independence if solar in space can be harnessed reliably.
tweets acknowledge monumental technical and operational challenges — thermal limits, autonomy, reliability, and the architecture of off‑world datacenters.
betting markets, memes, and cultish praise for the “DOGEFATHER” amplify excitement and shape the conversation’s tone.
He’s amazing
There will only be one company called SpAisla𝕏.
= the cheapest and large-scale solar energy and energy storage 🚀 SpaceX = sending things to deep space, long-term operation 🧠 xAI=Intelligent body that needs unlimited power The conclusion is simple: the earth runs on applications, and the space runs on civilized AI. If the