@unknown
@cb_doge Dogs in the future will be like the video below https://t.co/41OmszJWTU
Tweet analysis: predictions AI will be smarter, billions of robots, and autonomous cars. Support 34.32%, Confront 31.95% — mixed optimism and skepticism.
Real-time analysis of public opinion and engagement
Community concerns and opposing viewpoints
Many readers call the 10‑year timeline wildly optimistic, pointing to past missed predictions and urging more realism about what’s technically achievable.
A large group worries about job displacement and asks bluntly what will happen to millions made redundant — “surplus humans,” idleness, and loss of purpose are repeated concerns.
the rich and corporations will capture gains while the rest suffer, with several commenters calling the vision politically naive or a new form of socialism.
Technical skeptics emphasize concrete limits — robotics, energy, materials, maintenance, and infrastructure — arguing humanoid deployment and mass robotics are far from scalable.
if services are “free,” many assert that users become the product, and platform power/censorship raises democratic concerns.
A steady current of replies insists AI can’t truly surpass humans, claiming it merely mimics training data and can’t originate radical creativity or consciousness.
Several commenters call for legal guardrails — unless tech, markets, and behavior are constrained by legislation, they fear harmful outcomes and concentration of power.
from fears of an AI dictator to apocalyptic conspiracy threads, some view the scenario as threatening civilisation.
references to Jevons’ Paradox, resource constraints, and the persistence of scarcity argue that goods won’t simply become “free.”
A mix of admiration and skepticism toward Elon shows up — many respect his track record but distrust grand projections framed as investor-friendly hype.
jokes, memes, and blunt “nope” reactions coexist with more reasoned critique, keeping the tone sharply skeptical.
prepare for disruption, regulate proactively, and focus on equitable distribution of AI’s benefits rather than assuming utopia.
@cb_doge Dogs in the future will be like the video below https://t.co/41OmszJWTU
@cb_doge But no AI can ever be otterly cuter than me! https://t.co/5gcKLUoCKy
@cb_doge You don't say? https://t.co/W69H6iv1b1
Community members who agree with this perspective
many replies cheer the vision — callers are hyped, ready to build businesses, and celebrate a future of AI-driven abundance with billion-robot fleets and self-driving cars.
a large group thinks 10 years is too conservative — predictions like 2028 and “much less than 10 years” recur across replies.
readers vividly picture near-free goods and services, optional human labor, new status symbols, and leisure-focused lifestyles.
frequent worries about jobs, municipal revenue (speeding/parking loss), and which groups will control and benefit from the transition.
many urge regulation, containment of recursive self-improvement, and new economic models to manage existential and distributional risks.
several replies treat the roadmap as an urgent go-to-market signal — “who’s in?” and “form businesses around this” appear repeatedly.
enthusiasm and optimism sit alongside fear and cautious realism — admiration for the tech’s promise is balanced with questions about ethics, purpose, and societal readiness.
@cb_doge Yes. We are fully locked in to make it happen. https://t.co/GCGSbczSUg
@cb_doge If that curve holds, the real scarcity won’t be intelligence or labor — it’ll be purpose, judgment, and values. Technology accelerates; meaning becomes the differentiator.
@cb_doge I think it will be much less than 10 years. Its growth is exponential.